The “could not write to hash-join temporary” error means that the hash join could not build the table. This problem occurs when the database is too large for the partitioning required to store the data. A large number of rows can cause this problem. In such cases, it is necessary to use the parallel join strategy. The partitioning process involves many phases and processes. The first step is the build phase.
Next, it is important to determine the cause of this error. It may be related to the failure of re-reading the probe table or writing partition data into the temporary tablespace. Generally, the problem is with the writes of partition data. This is often related to a problem with the Adaptive Join operator. It is recommended to use the “Adaptive Join” operator if you experience this issue.
The problem is not related to the re-reading of the probe table. The error is related to the failure of the query optimizer to write the partition data into a temporary tablespace. The problem is not related to re-reading the probe table, but rather with the problem of writing partition data to a temporary file. Fortunately, there are alternatives to this problem. You should select a solution that has the same first child.
Fortunately, there are other solutions for this problem. The main ones are parallel hash join and Merge Join. You should choose the one that suits your needs. Then, you can test your queries using the adapted join. Then, you can compare the results of the two. If the parallel hash join fails, you can try the other one. If you are not satisfied with the performance of the former, you can go back to using the parallel hash join.
Lastly, you should consider the Parallel Hash join. It is similar to Hash join, except that it uses a different algorithm. Then, you can run a batch of operations with both of them. In contrast to the former, the latter is the more efficient of the two. Its name is the same as the former, so it can also be written to a separate temporary file.
When using the parallel hash join, you should remember to use this mode to write data to the temporary file. However, it is not recommended for use in non-parallel-aware applications because it does not use a partitioning first algorithm. The other option, which uses Batch mode, is the “No partition” approach. In contrast to the latter, this method does not have a recursive model. Instead, it executes a single, pre-sorted inner plan.
In the previous version of the application, you could not write to hash-join’s temporary file. This error is caused by the fact that the hash-join is not allowed in a multipartitioned environment. This means that the process is not scalable. Therefore, you should make sure that you are using the parallel hash join in a multi-partitioned environment.
This method works in parallel but it cannot be used for one-pass joins. The two-pass join requires 75 slots for the data to be sorted. The parallel hash join is a great option for multi-pass access. It is a better choice for many reasons. You will save time and money. If you are running a complex multi-partitioned application, you will want to avoid this error.
In a multi-partitioned environment, the partitioning is done in parallel. You should ensure that the partitioning is done correctly before applying the hash join to it. If there is an index-join, you should use the parallel version. Otherwise, the merge will fail in this mode. In addition, the hash join may also fail when the data is partitioned by the column.
Using the parallel hash join approach is better than using the traditional in-memory join. This approach enables the database to use multiple disks and partitions. The problem is solved by the fact that the SQL Server reverses the roles between the build and the probe. Once the spilled partition is deleted, the parallel hash join becomes the default. With this, the recursive hash join can be used to perform large-scale operations.